Paraprobar la eficiencia del renovado SUV compacto de Mazda, ponemos a prueba el CX-30 2.0 e-Skyactiv G 150 CV, con cambio manual de seis velocidades y tracción delantera. El resultado fue un consumo medio de 4,75 l/100 km (21,05 km/l) en la ruta de referencia de 360 km de Roma a Forlì, gastando 30,32 euros de gasolina en el

Mazda3 Hatchback vs Mazda CX-30 Comparison. Below is the detailed Cars comparison, based on price, specifications & other features, of Mazda 3 Hatchback and Mazda CX-30. Mazda 3 Hatchback is priced between Rp 555,5 Million while Mazda CX-30 is priced between Rp 548,8 Million. Talking about the technical specifications, Mazda

Thebig difference between the two SUVs lies in the engines. The C-HR offers two hybrid versions with 138 bhp and 194 bhp, plus a plug-in hybrid with 220 bhp. Only the e-CVT automatic transmission, which simulates the operation of a continuously variable gearbox, is available. The CX-30 is also available only in electrified versions, but

Iown a Mazda CX-30. This car was meant for driving. 2.5L engine which they use in a CX-50) all wheel drive, luxurious interior, sporty exterior, and the car drives like butter. Super smooth and comfortable, all while being a fun experience every time. Ultimate I feel Mazda just gives you more bang for your buck, especially with the CX-30. Sobuckle up and get ready for a ride as we explore the 2023 Mazda 3 vs. Mazda CX-30. Hold on tight, folks, because Mazda has done it again! The Mazda 3 . 472 314 278 96 62 415 96 125

mazda cx 30 o mazda 3